Cantrell v. Baker et al
| Jimmy Shane Cantrell |
| Baker, Daniel Golden, Wendy Kelley, Lynn Bennett, Mullins, Lennon Hardy, Raylina Ramsey, Brian S Miller, J T Kearney, Steven Ricketts, Nicholas Wolff, Maurice Culclager, Joe J Volpe, Gary Musselwhite, Billy Roy Wilson, John Does and Lyn Bennett |
| 1:2019cv00044 |
| June 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 OBJECTION to #10 Report and Recommendations by Jimmy Shane Cantrell. (kdr) |
Filing 10
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice #2 . The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any order adopting this recommendation and the accompany judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 7/15/2019. (lej)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying Plaintiff's IFP Application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) #1 . Plaintiff must submit to the Clerk the statutory filing fee of $400, in full, within 21 days of the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/20/2019. (lej)
|
|
Filing 8
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for TRO #7 . Plaintiff is currently housed at the Tucker Unit and his emergency motion raises new and unrelated allegations that occurred previously at the Grimes Unit. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion for "immediate" relief "to prevent further irreparable harm" is frivolous and should be denied on that basis alone. I also note that Plaintiff is a "three striker" and has neither paid the requisite filing fee nor shown how he qualifies to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/20/2019. (lej)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Immediate Temporary Restraining Order by Jimmy Shane Cantrell. (ljb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Jimmy Shane Cantrell. (ljb) |
|
Filing 5
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER because Plaintiff is a three-striker with an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis that has been held in abeyance until he provides more information to the Court, his motions for a temporary restraining order, show cause, and/or preliminary injunction are denied as premature #4 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/10/2019. (lej)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Immediate Temporary Restraining Order, Order to Show Cause and Preliminary Injunction by Jimmy Shane Cantrell. (kdr) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees is held in abeyance #1 . If Plaintiff wishes to amend his complaint, he may complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this order, mark it as "Amended Complaint," and file it within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/5/2019. (lej)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Jimmy Shane Cantrell.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jimmy Shane Cantrell. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
