Ring v. Roork et al
Plaintiff: William Earl Ring, III
Defendant: John Cawvey, Joann Cunningham and Albert Roork
Case Number: 1:2019cv00054
Filed: June 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Kristine G Baker
Referring Judge: Joe J Volpe
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by William Earl Ring, III (kbc)
July 26, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Address Correction by William Earl Ring, III. (kdr)
July 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted #2 . Dismissal of this action count as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any order adopting these recommendations and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 7/25/2019. (lej)
July 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting Plaintiff's IFP Application #4 . Service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 7/15/2019. (lej)
July 12, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing of Certificate from IFP by William Earl Ring, III. (ljb)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying Plaintiff's IFP Application #1 . Plaintiff must, within 30 days of the date of this order, either: (a) pay the full $400 filing fee; or (b) file a properly completed IFP Application and Calculation Sheet. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/28/2019. (lej)
June 27, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by William Earl Ring, III. (llg)
June 27, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William Earl Ring, III. (llg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ring v. Roork et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Earl Ring, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Cawvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joann Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Albert Roork
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?