Gill v. Osborne et al
Johnse D Gill |
Sisson Construction Company, Zebarious Hawkins, Michael D Osborne, Armstrong, Does Medical Staff, Grimes Unit and J C Cranford |
1:2019cv00076 |
August 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Patricia S Harris |
Brian S Miller |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS directing the Clerk of Court to enclose an IFP application along with a copy of this order; and directing plaintiff to return a completed IFP application or pay the $400 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 8/28/2019. (ljb) |
Filing 3 Case electronically transferred in from District of Arkansas Western; Case Number 5:19-cv-05164. Electronic file copy of transfer order, case file, and docket sheet received. |
Filing 2 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Eastern District of Arkansas, Northern Division. Docket Sheet and case documents sent to receiving court. Signed by Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann on August 28, 2019. (lgd) [Transferred from arwd on 8/28/2019.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Armstrong, J.C. Cranford, Zebarious Hawkins, Medical Staff of Grimes Unit, Michael D. Osborne, Sisson Construction Company, filed by Johnse D. Gill.(lgd) [Transferred from arwd on 8/28/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.