Braddock v. Banks
Shindid A Braddock |
Andrew Banks |
1:2019cv00084 |
September 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Patricia S Harris |
D P Marshall |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER allowing Braddock another opportunity to amend her complaint conforming to this order within 30 days; and directing the Clerk of Court to send Braddock a blank 1983 form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 10/16/2019. (ljb) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Andrew Banks, filed by Shindid A Braddock.(kdr) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #3 application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this order to the Warden of the McPherson Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralization Bank Office, and the ADC Compliance Office; directing Braddock to file an amended complaint no later than 30 days after this order's entry date; and directing the Clerk of Court to send Braddock a blank 1983 form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 9/30/2019. (ljb) |
Filing 5 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. A civil litigant does not have a constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in a civil action but the Court may appoint counsel at its discretion. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). The Court has considered plaintiff's need for an attorney, the likelihood that plaintiff will benefit from assistance of counsel, the factual complexity of the case, the plaintiff's ability to investigate and present his case, and the complexity of the legal issues. In considering these factors, the Court finds that plaintiff's claims do not appear legally or factually complex, and it appears he is capable of prosecuting his claims without appointed counsel at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 9/27/2019. (cfd) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Shindid A Braddock. (ljb) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shindid A Braddock. (ljb) |
Filing 2 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS directing the Clerk of Court to enclose an IFP application along with a copy of this order; and directing Braddock to return a completed IFP application or pay the $400 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 9/10/2019. (ljb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Banks filed by Shindid A Braddock. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Braddock v. Banks | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shindid A Braddock | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew Banks | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.