Cassity v. Counts et al
Dandra Shawntone Cassity and D'Andra Shawntone Cassity |
Doe, Mark Counts and Hardy City of |
1:2019cv00088 |
September 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Kristine G Baker |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to D'Andra Shawntone Cassity re Notice of Docket Correction re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #2 Complaint. (fjg) |
Filing 3 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to D'Andra Shawntone Cassity re Notice of Docket Correction re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (fjg) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text for each entry was modified to correct Plaintiff's name to be D'Andra Shawntone Cassity. (thd) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the description of the document filed as "COMPLAINT against all Defendants filed by Dandra Shawntone Cassity." (thd) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against all Defendants filed by Dandra Shawntone Cassity. (llg) (Docket text modified on 9/12/2019 to correct the description of the document filed.) (thd). |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dandra Shawntone Cassity. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.