Everett v. Diddo et al
| Christopher Everett |
| Diddo, Sissy, Shawn Stephens, Sissy Wilson, Pinkston and Cole |
| 1:2019cv00114 |
| November 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER that the Clerk prepare summons and the USM serve Defendant Stephens without prepayment of fees or security therefore. Defendants must, within 14 days of the entry of this order, file a sealed statement containing Defendant Diddo's last known private mailing address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/16/2020. (lej)
|
| Filing 16 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Diddo. (ajt) |
| Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Christopher Everett. (Docketed pursuant to 14 Order) (jbh) |
|
Filing 14
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting Plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint #13 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/15/2020. (lej)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Amend #2 Complaint by Christopher Everett. (Attachment: #(1) Proposed Amended Complaint) (llg) |
| Filing 12 REPLY to #8 Answer to Complaint by Christopher Everett. (llg) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Sissy served on 12/23/2019. (fjg) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Pinkston served on 12/23/2019. (fjg) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Cole served on 12/23/2019. (fjg) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Cole, Pinkston, Sissy.(Thomas, JaNan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by JaNan Arnold Thomas on behalf of Cole, Pinkston, Sissy (Thomas, JaNan) |
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (jbh) |
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel #5 . A civil litigant does not have a constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in a civil action but the Court may appoint counsel at its discretion. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). The Court has considered Plaintiff's need for an attorney, the likelihood that Plaintiff will benefit from assistance of counsel, the factual complexity of the case, the Plaintiff's ability to investigate and present his case, and the complexity of the legal issues. In considering these factors, the Court finds that Plaintiff's claims do not appear legally or factually complex, and it appears he is capable of prosecuting his claims without appointed counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/27/2019. (lej)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Christopher Everett. (kdr) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER that the Clerk add Jailers Cole and Pinkston as Defendants and prepare summons for Diddo, Sissy, Cole, and Pinkston. The USM shall serve these Defendants without prepayment of fees or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/19/2019. (lej)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting Plaintiff's IFP Application #1 . Service will be issued in a separate order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/19/2019. (lej)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Christopher Everett. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Everett. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
