Suggs v. Mobley et al
| 2:2005cv00281 |
| November 8, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Jerry W. Cavaneau |
| James M Moody |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to 156 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 2/19/09. (mkf)
|
|
Filing
154
ORDER cancelling trial scheduled for the week of February 9, 2009. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 2/6/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER ADOPTING 145 Partial Report and Recommendations, granting [130, Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Max Mobley and dismissing plaintiff's claims against him with prejudice; and granting in part and denying in part 133 Motion for Summa ry Judgment filed by Beatrice Boyd, Lynn Lewis, Dottie Yarbrough, Brenda Bearden, Shirley Crawford and dismissing claims against defts Lewis, Boyd and Bearden, with plaintiff's case against defts Yarbrough and Crawford to proceed. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 1/5/09. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Suggs v. Mobley et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
