Jackson v. Speed et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 14, 2010
ORDER directing the Central Office of the Arkansas Department of Corrections to ensure the attendance of Daniel K. Strickland at the jury trial scheduled for 8:30 a.m. on Tuesday, January 19, 2010, and each day thereafter until the trial is concluded. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/14/10. (bkp)
|July 24, 2009
ORDER authorizing named personnel of the Alexander Law Firm to bring electronics into the courthouse in Little Rock, Arkansas, between July 27, 2009, and July 29, 2009. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/24/09. (mkf)
|October 3, 2008
ORDER concluding that the 178 Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; denying as moot 152 Motion for Summary Judgment o f separate Correctional Medical Services Defendants; dismissing Defendant Hickey and the John Doe Defendants; granting in part and denying in part 146 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing, with prejudice, Plaintiff's claims that he was denied a bed mat or water. Arkansas Department of Correction Defendants Barns, Decorsey, Avant, Maney, Golatt, Brooks, and Williams, as well as separate Defendants Speed and Ivey, are entitled to sovereign immunity as to tthe official capacity claims against them but are not entitled to qualified immunity. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/02/08. (hph)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?