Walker v. Mr Maintenance Inc

Plaintiff: Joe Walker, II
Defendant: Mr Maintenance Inc
Case Number: 2:2007cv00067
Filed: May 24, 2007
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Helena Office
County: Crittenden
Presiding Judge: James M Moody
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 19, 2009 76 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT in favor of defts against pltf re 75 Order dismissing plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/19/09. (bkp)
December 3, 2008 37 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 36 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice deft Bobby Davis Electric co., Inc. as a party to this case. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/3/08. (bkp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Mr Maintenance Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Walker, II
Represented By: B. Michael Easley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr Maintenance Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?