Ross v. Advance America Cash Advance Centers Inc et al
| Lavern Ross |
| Advance America Cash Advance Centers Inc, Advance America Cash Advance Centers of Arkansas Inc and Advance America Cash Advance Centers |
| 2:2007cv00116 |
| August 31, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Mississippi |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
OPINION AND ORDER re 53 Bill of Costs, in light of Ross's limited financial means, and the disparity between her means and those of Advance America, the Court will exercise its discretion not to award costs. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/7/09. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
46
OPINION AND ORDER that summary judgment 34 is granted to Defts on Pltf's claims under the Family Medical Leave Act, Title VII, and the Americans With Disabilities Act; Pltf also agrees that she has no claims under Title VII in addition to her claims related to disability and retaliation arising under the ADA, so those claims are dismissed as well; Pltf's state law claims are dismissed without prejudice; Defts' 44 Motion to Strike Affidavits is denied as moot; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/24/09. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
