Gammon v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department et al
| Willie Gammon |
| Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department, Arkansas Highway Police, Dan Flowers and Ron Burks |
| 2:2007cv00148 |
| November 29, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Crittenden |
| William R. Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
JUDGMENT pursuant to 53 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment ; case is dismissed in its entirety. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 5/8/09. (mkf)
|
|
Filing
47
LETTER ORDER to Counsel re 45 Response to and 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment: Defts may file a reply briefing the issue outlined in this letter by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, April 24, 2009; plaintiff should respond by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, May 1, 2009. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 4/20/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying 29 defts' Second Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 3/9/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
32
LETTER ORDER re 29 Second MOTION to Dismiss directing plaintiff to respond by noon on Friday, March 6, 2009, if he disagrees with defts' position. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 3/2/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying 20 Motion to Compel; granting 22 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 10/10/08. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
