Brooks v. Sanders et al

Case Number: 2:2007cv00156
Filed: December 17, 2007
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Helena Office
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Referring Judge: H. David Young
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 29, 2008 68 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting 66 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, Defts' 21 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/29/08. (vjt)
December 10, 2008 66 Opinion or Order of the Court PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending 21 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, and that this case be dismissed, with prejudice; and recommending the court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order and Judgment adopting this Recommended Disposition would not be taken in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 12/24/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 12/10/08. (hph) (docket text modified on 1/8/2009 to correct name of Judge that signed document) (bfw).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooks v. Sanders et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?