Butler v. Wards et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 23, 2009
ORDER adopting 63 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, Defts' 44 Second Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and Pltf's remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to his failure to timely and properly exhaust his administrative remedies; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/23/09. (vjt)
|April 3, 2009
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending 44 Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Request for an Evidentiary Hearing on the Issue of Exhaustion, and that Plaintiff's remaining claims be d ismissed, without prejudice, due to his failure to timely and properly exhaust his administrative remedies; and recommending the court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order and Judgment adopting this Recommended Disposition would not be taken in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 4/17/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 4/3/09. (hph)
|October 16, 2008
ORDER ADOPTING 32 Partial Report and Recommendations and granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Dismiss; defts DHO Wards, Jemmott, and Moores are dismissed without prejudice, and certifying that an ifp appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith; and ordering defts Lt. Wards, Gonzalez, Levin and Gaila to file an Answer within ten days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/16/08. (bkp)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?