Hinds v. Edwards et al
| Timothy M Hinds |
| Peter Edwards and Larry Norris |
| 2:2008cv00086 |
| May 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office |
| Lee |
| Jerry W. Cavaneau |
| James M. Moody |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
JUDGMENT in favor of Peter Edwards against Timothy M Hinds re 47 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and dismissing plaintiff's claims with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/16/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
44
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that 26 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that Plaintiff's claims be dismissed with prejudice; and recommending that 41 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel be denied. Objections to R&R due by 3/18/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 4/4/09. (hph)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 12 Partial Report and Recommendations and dismissing claims against deft Norris without prejudice. Service is appropriate for deft Edwards and the Clerk is directed to prepare a summons and the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of the or iginal complaint w/any attachments, a copy of pltf's objections to the Magistrate's proposed recommendations, a copy of the docket sheet, and a summons for deft through Humphries & Lewis Law firm, without prepayment of fees. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 9/26/08. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
