Flores v. Outlaw
Plaintiff: Hector Flores
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Case Number: 2:2008cv00108
Filed: June 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: St. Francis
Presiding Judge: James M. Moody
Presiding Judge: Jerry W. Cavaneau
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Respondent's 6 MOTION to Dismiss, thereby denying this habeas petition and dismissing this case in its entirety; Petitioner's 13 MOTION to Transfer Case is denied; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau on 1/6/09. (vjt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flores v. Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hector Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?