Martinez v. Outlaw

Plaintiff: Bernardo Martinez
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Case Number: 2:2008cv00139
Filed: July 18, 2008
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: St. Francis
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Referring Judge: J. Thomas Ray
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 27, 2009 16 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT : Consistent with the 15 Memorandum and Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (docket entry #1) is DENIED, and this habeas action is hereby DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/27/09. (hph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martinez v. Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernardo Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?