Winnett v. Edwards et al
| Donald Winnett |
| M Williams, LeBelong, Green and Joe Hughes |
| 2:2008cv00199 |
| November 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Lee |
| Henry L. Jones |
| James M. Moody |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
JUDGMENT in favor of defendants against Donald Winnett pursuant to 110 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and dismissing this case without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/15/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
107
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending defts LeBelong, M Williams, and Green's motion for summary judgment be granted and pltf's complaint against them be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 12/2/09. (tjj)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER granting 66 Motion to Dismiss Party Dr. Joe Hughes from this lawsuit. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 4/13/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 40 Motion to Dismiss deft Dr. Edwards as a party to this case. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 1/20/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 that plaintiff's food/kitchen claim against deft Bell is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/2/08. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
