Bell v. Ramesy et al
Daniel Bell |
D Ramesy, Greg Harmon and P Hill |
2:2009cv00084 |
July 1, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Helena Office |
Lee |
Henry L. Jones |
Brian S. Miller |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 JUDGMENT re 61 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations dismissing the case without prejudice and denying the relief sought. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/15/10. (bkp) |
Filing 53 ORDER re 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by defts.: Plaintiff is directed to file a response within 10 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 7/8/10. (bkp) |
Filing 23 ORDER directing that 22 MOTION for Discovery filed by Daniel Bell be re-docketed as a request for discovery from the defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 11/4/09. (bkp) |
Filing 19 ORDER Adopting 6 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; defendant P. Hill is DISMISSED from plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/8/09. (mkf) |
Filing 8 ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons and the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons, complaint and amended complaint on defts D. Ramesy and Greg Harmon in care of the ADC Compliance Division, P.O. Box 20550, Pine Bluff, AR 71612-0550, without prepayment of fees therefor. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/11/09. (bkp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.