Robason v. Thomas et al
| Gene Austin Robason |
| Michael Thomas, John Doe and Helena-West Helena, Arkansas |
| 2:2010cv00037 |
| March 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
JUDGMENT pursuant to 66 Jury Verdict, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Michael Thomas dismissing the complaint of Gene Austin Robason with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/18/11. (vjt) (Docket entry modified on 10/19/2011 to correct the file date.) (thd).
|
|
Filing
63
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part defts' 29 Motion for Summary Judgment; defts' 57 Motion in Limine is denied. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/13/11. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER granting 48 49 Motions for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Disclosure Sheets; Pretrial Disclosure Sheet due by 9/30/2011. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/27/11. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting defts' 22 Motion to Extend Deadline for Filing Dispositive Motions; Motions due by 3/3/2011. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/18/11. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting defts' 14 Motion to Extend Deadlines; Discovery due by 2/3/2011; Dispositive Motions due by 2/17/2011. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/18/11. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
