Banks v. Outlaw

Plaintiff: Torrence Ray Banks
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Case Number: 2:2010cv00060
Filed: April 30, 2010
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Helena Office
County: St. Francis
Presiding Judge: James M. Moody
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 14, 2010 24 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT re 23 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and dismissing the case with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/14/10. (bkp)
November 29, 2010 20 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Torrence Ray Banks be DENIED and this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Banks's 19 Motion for Judgment be DENIED; Objections to R&R due within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 11/29/10. (vjt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Banks v. Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Torrence Ray Banks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?