Conway v. Kelley et al
| Byron L Conway |
| Wendy Kelley, Rory Griffin, Dottie Yarbrough, Whitmore, A Green, K Grigsby, D Lebel, Correctional Medical Services and Childress |
| 2:2010cv00143 |
| September 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Jackson |
| D. P. Marshall |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
JUDGMENT re 54 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and dismissing plaintiff's complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/8/11. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray's Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition; granting 10 Conway's motion to dismiss; and dismissing Defendants Wendy Kelly, Rory Griffin, and Dottie Yarbrough from this case without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/14/11. (hph)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER adopting in part and rejecting in part 6 Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray's Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition; dismissing with prejudice all official-capacity claims for money damages that Conway has pleaded against any immune Defendant; and ordering service upon Defendants Whitmore, Lebel, Kelley, Griffin, Yarbrough, and Ferricher. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/22/10. (hph)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
