Croston v. Burl et al
| Detrick D Croston |
| Danny Burl, David Ball, Moses Jackson, Michael Humphrey, Willie Tinzie, William Ivory, Anthony Eaton, Benjamin Woodard, Janice Bogan-Hall, Barbra Esters, Valerie Westbrook, Polly James, Shelia Henderson, Deborah Smith and Janice Gray |
| 2:2011cv00006 |
| January 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Lee |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| James M. Moody |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
JUDGMENT re 42 Memorandum and Order dismissing the complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 5/17/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER adopting in their entirety 22 partial proposed findings and recommendations from U.S. Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney; and, dismissing Defendants James, Henderson, Smith and Gray without prejudice for failure to state a claim and for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 6/10/2011. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER re 3 Amended Complaint filed by Detrick D Croston. Pltf is directed to file a superceding Amended Complaint which clearly sets forth his claims against the four new defts named in his Amended Complaint. The superceding Amended Complaint should be filed within 15 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/19/11. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
