Welker v. USA et al
Christopher Welker |
Charles Crow, Robert Bynum, USA, T C Outlaw, P Herrington, Michael Breckon, Annita Ford, Does, Norville and Dallas Johnson |
2:2011cv00107 |
June 15, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Helena Office |
St. Francis |
Brian S. Miller |
H. David Young |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER re 37 MOTION to Dismiss. The Court construes this motion as a motion for summary judgment and will allow the parties to submit an additional brief and/or evidence in support of their respective positions within ten days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 2/15/12. (kpr) |
Filing 54 ORDER denying 50 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting 51 Motion to Clarify. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 1/30/12. (kpr) |
Filing 29 ORDER adopting 6 Magistrate Judge H. David Young's Partial Report and Recommendations. Does, Annita Ford, P Herrington, Dallas Johnson, Norville, T C Outlaw, Robert Bynum and Charles Crow terminated are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/17/11. (hph) |
Filing 11 ORDER directing the U.S. Marshal to serve summons, complaint, and this Order on deft Breckon, the U.S. Attorney General, and the U.S. Attorney's Office without prepayment of fees and costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 9/12/11. (vjt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.