Holt v. USA et al
| Rodney S Holt |
| John Does, Nader Peikar, Hipolito Matos, USA, T C Outlaw and Mary Ellen Rivers-Graham |
| 2:2011cv00180 |
| September 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| St. Francis |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL the John Doe Defendants (1-10 - FCI - Forrest City) are dismissed without prejudice due to lack of service. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/5/12. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING 25 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, defts' 13 Motion to Dismiss in Lieu of Answer is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; pltf may proceed with his Eighth Amendment inadequate medical care claim against defts Peikar and Does; all other claims and defts are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Nader Peikar answer due within 14 days of the entry of this Order; Mary Ellen Rivers-Graham, Hipolito Matos, and T C Outlaw terminated. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 5/16/12. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 23 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, 21 Unopposed MOTION to Dismiss Count III of the Complaint filed by Rodney S Holt is GRANTED, and pltf's FTCA claim and deft USA are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/30/12. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
