Glass v. BPS Inc
Plaintiff: Aaron Lee Glass, Sr
Defendant: BPS Inc
Case Number: 2:2011cv00243
Filed: December 30, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Helena Office
County: Phillips
Presiding Judge: Susan Webber Wright
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting deft's 10 Motion to Compel; pltf is directed to provide deft with responses to discovery requests within 10 days from the entry date of this Order. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/26/12. (vjt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Glass v. BPS Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BPS Inc
Represented By: William Stuart Jackson
Represented By: Regina Ann Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron Lee Glass, Sr
Represented By: J. F. Valley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?