Russell v. Breedlove et al
| David Russell |
| Breedlove, Skrapates, Crystal Sims and Wendy Kelly |
| 2:2012cv00107 |
| June 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Lee |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge that 5 Defendant Wendy Kelly be dismissed from this action with prejudice. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this order is considered frivilous and not in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/19/2012. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare summons for the defts Crystal Sims and Andrea Breedlove, and the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of the summons and the Amended Complaint on defts at the addresses provided under seal without prepayment of costs therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 8/29/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons for defts Breedlove, Skrapates, Sims, and Campbell. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve defts a copy of the summons and Amended Complaint without prepayment of costs therefor in care of Humphries & Lewis Law Firm, P.O. Box 20670, White Hall, AR 71612. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 8/2/12. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
