Coley v. Floyd et al
| Antonio DeMarion Coley |
| Marybeth Floyd, Crystal Sims, Christopher Loe, Chiketa Davis, Walter Hollaway, Danny Burl, Paulette Green, Larry May, Denise Jones, Claudia Harris, Wendy Kelley and Ray Hobbs |
| 2:2012cv00160 |
| August 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Lee |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| H. David Young |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 132 Order that was entered on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this action is dismissed with prejudice. The relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 03/30/2015. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER ADOPTING 63 and 66 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge; Defendant Holloway's 56 Motion to quash service and dismiss party is granted in part and denied in part. Mr. Holloway's request to quash the service of process attempted on him to the Arkansas Department of Health in Little Rock is granted. The motion is denied in all other respects. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Crystal Sims, Christopher Loe, Chiquita Davis and Mr. Holloway are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/11/2014. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying plaintiff's appeal. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/24/12. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
