Roberts v. Arkansas Military Department et al
Denicia V Roberts |
Arkansas Military Department, William Johnson and Ray Moix |
2:2013cv00091 |
July 9, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Helena Office |
Pulaski |
J. Leon Holmes |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 84 ORDER granting plaintiff's 83 motion to dismiss. The complaint of Denicia V. Roberts against the Arkansas Military Department and William Johnson is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/12/2016. (ljb) |
Filing 43 ORDER granting 36 Third Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. All of Roberts's claims are dismissed, except her Title VII hostile work environment claim against the Arkansas Military Department and her official-capacity section 198 3 claim against Johnson for declaratory and prospective injunctive relief. Those claims will proceed. Roberts's other claims against the Arkansas Military Department under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act are dismissed with prejudice. Her retaliation claims under Title VII and her individual capacity claims against Ray Moix are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/17/2014. (ks) |
Filing 33 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Dismiss. Roberts must file an amended complaint within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/12/2014. (ks) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.