May v. Haynes et al
| Loren W May, Sr |
| Ron Smith, A Haynes and Does |
| 2:2013cv00127 |
| September 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| St. Francis |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 48 Order entered in this matter on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case be, and it is hereby, dismissed without prejudice. The relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/31/2014. (ks)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER directing the Plaintiff to file within 30 days a Response to 29 MOTION to Dismiss and alternatively, motion for summary judgment filed by A Haynes, Ron Smith, Hay, Graham and a separate Statement of Disputed Facts that comply with t he Local Rules and the instructions set forth in this order. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to timely and properly comply with this Order will result in: (a) all of the facts in Defendants' summary judgment papers being deemed admitted by Plaintiff; or (b) the dismissal of this action, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 04/08/2014. (kcs) (Docket text modified on 4/8/2014 to correct a typographical error).(jak)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER denying 26 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 03/06/2014. (kcs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
