Davis v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Doris Ann Davis
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2013cv00167
Filed: December 16, 2013
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Helena Office
County: Phillips
Presiding Judge: James M. Moody
Referring Judge: H. David Young
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:0405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 29, 2015 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ACCEPTING 14 Recommended Disposition. Doris Ann Davis's 2 request for relief is DENIED. The decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is affirmed. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/29/2015. (mcz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Doris Ann Davis
Represented By: Wayne West Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Stacey Elise McCord
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?