Scoggins v. Helena-West Helena Arkansas, City of et al
Carl Scoggins |
Helena-West Helena Arkansas, City of, Uless Wallace, Travis Wallace, Timothy Fugate, Troy House, Matthew Jarrett, Michael Harris and Amos Bryant |
2:2013cv00171 |
December 20, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Helena Office |
Phillips |
J. Leon Holmes |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice and instructing the Clerk to terminate this action. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/7/2015. (ks) |
Filing 23 ORDER directing Wallace, House, and Jarrett to supplement their motion, providing evidence on the issue of the cause of the default and an explanation of the grounds for their defense on the merits, as well as a brief. Such supplemental motion must be filed on or before July 18, 2014. If Scoggins wishes to file a reply, he may do so on or before July 25, 2014. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/3/2014. (jak) |
Filing 2 ORDER directing the Plaintiff that the Court will dismiss this action unless proof of service is filed on or before Wednesday, May 28, 2014, or the Plaintiff establishes good cause for the failure to serve summons and complaint on the defendants within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/28/2014. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.