Shah v. Wingo et al
| Vivek Shah |
| Michelle Wingo, C V Rivera, J Relvas and Mullens |
| 2:2015cv00004 |
| January 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| St. Francis |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety the three Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Dispositions 85 , 89 and 93 as this Court's findings in all respects; granting defendants' 80 motion for partial summary judgment; d ismissing without prejudice plaintiff Vivek Shah's claims against defendant Summer Birkhead; dismissing Mr. Shah's Federal Torts Claims Act claims against defendant United States of America as outlined; granting defendant Michelle Wingo 9;s 90 motion for partial summary judgment; dismissing with prejudice Mr. Shah's claims against Ms. Wingo; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/12/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER requesting both sides respond to this Court's order to submit additional pleadings by 1/8/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 12/8/2015. (lej)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion to compel and supplement to the motion to compel 71 74 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/29/2015. (lej)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER approving and adopting 43 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; denying Mr. Shah's 15 motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 06/08/2015. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER adopting 33 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Mr. Vivek may proceed with his inadequate medical care claims against defendants Michelle Wingo, Summer Birkhead, and the Unit ed States of America (via the Federal Tort Claims Act). The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Mr. Shah's state law claims and dismisses those claims without prejudice. Should he choose to do so, Mr. Shah may pursue thes e claims in Arkansas state court. The Court dismisses all other claims without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Although the Court has carefully considered Mr. Shah's arguments, the Court adopts Judge Vol pe's decision to deny Mr. Shah's 40 motion for leave to file a second amended complaint for the reasons stated in his Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/18/2015. (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
