Stilley v. USA et al
Oscar Stilley |
USA, Department of Justice, Charles E Samuels, Jr, J A Keller, C V Rivera, Becky Clay, Chester Torry, C Glasgow, B Hunt and Mosby |
2:2015cv00163 |
October 6, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Helena Office |
Out of State |
Beth Deere |
Brian S. Miller |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 93 ORDER adopting in its entirety 82 the recommended disposition; granting the government's 51 motion for summary judgment, and dismissing this case, with prejudice; denying as moot 75 86 plaintiff's motions to compel, 87 to disqualify, and 88 to stay. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/16/2018. (kdr) |
Filing 71 ORDER adopting 63 the partial recommended disposition; and denying 49 Stilley's motion for default judgment and to strike the United States's answer. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/24/2017. (kdr) |
Filing 42 ORDER adopting in part and rejecting in part 35 the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition. Stilley's claim under the Freedom of Information Act and his claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act arising from his incarceration at FCI Oakdale are dismissed without prejudice because the failure to exhaust administrative remedies does not warrant dismissal with prejudice. The rest of the PRD is adopted in its entirety. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/3/2016. (kdr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.