Piker v. USA et al
| James Ray Piker |
| USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons and C V Rivera |
| 2:2015cv00183 |
| November 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| St. Francis |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 47 Order entered in this matter on this date, it is Considered, Ordered and Adjudged that this case is dismissed with prejudice. The relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/10/2017. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER adopting in their entirety the 32 proposed findings and recommendations; granting Defendants' 27 motion to dismiss; dismissing Plaintiff's Bivens claims; and dismissing without prejudice Defendants Bushaw, Winbush, and Does for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/2/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER adopting 13 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; dismissing Defendants Federal Bureau of Prisons, Rivera, and Andrews for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and dismissing Plaintiff's claims pursuant to the ADA for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/3/2016. (ljb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
