Muldrow v. Bureau of Prisons et al
| Lealon Muldrow |
| Bureau of Prisons and Does |
| 2:2015cv00203 |
| December 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Out of State |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 72 Order entered in this matter on this date, it is Considered, Ordered and Adjudged that this case be, and it is hereby, dismissed with prejudice. The relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/30/2017. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER adopting in their entirety the 47 proposed findings and recommendations; and denying Plaintiff's 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/18/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER adopting 36 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; granting defendant Lam's 26 motion to dismiss, and he is dismissed from plaintiff's complaint; and denying plaintiff's 30 motion to amend. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/25/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING in full 14 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Lealon Muldrow's claims against the Bureau of Prisons are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/25/2016. (mcz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
