Fenner v. Lyles et al
Jason E Fenner |
Lyles, Snead and Does |
2:2016cv00113 |
August 24, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Helena Office |
Lee |
James M. Moody |
Joe J. Volpe |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING 19 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition. Defendant Lyles's 13 Motion to Dismiss is granted. Defendant Lyles is dismissed from this action with prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/28/2016. (mcz) |
Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING 17 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition. All Defendant Does are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Order and Motion to Amend/Correct is denied as moot. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/26/2016. (mcz) |
Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING 4 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition. Defendant Howard is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/12/2016. (mcz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.