Bush v. Davis et al
| Kenneth Bush |
| Roderick D Davis, Rory L Griffin, Wendy Kelly, Samantha Treadway and Tucker |
| 2:2016cv00160 |
| November 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Lee |
| Brian S. Miller |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER adopting 36 the recommended disposition; denying as moot 35 Bush's motion for service on Treadway; and granting 26 defendant Rory Griffin's motion for summary judgment. An appeal from this order would not in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/19/2017. (kdr)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER adopting 29 the recommended disposition; and granting 18 defendant Roderick Davis's motion to dismiss, and dismissing without prejudice Bush's claims against Davis. An appeal from this order would not be in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/27/2017. (kdr)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER adopting 4 the partial recommended disposition; dismissing, without prejudice, plaintiff Kenneth Bush's claims against defendant Wendy Kelley, but allowing him to proceed with his inadequate medical care claim against the remaining defendants; granting 5 Bush's motion for an extension of time to file objections; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/24/2017. (kdr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
