Foster v. Coleman et al
||Charles E Foster, Jr
||Tameka Coleman, Moses Jackson and Jefferey D Andrews, Jr
||February 1, 2017
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
||Joe J. Volpe
||Billy Roy Wilson
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 8, 2017
ORDER Adopting 20 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. Defendants' 17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is granted, and Defendants Coleman and Jackson are dismissed. Defendant Andrews is also dismissed. Plaintiff's 2 Co mplaint is also dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 4/8/2017. (mcz)
|February 24, 2017
ORDER approving and adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition in all respects; allowing Plaintiff to proceed on his due process claim against Defendants Coleman, Jackson, and Andrews; dismissing Defendant John Doe, who Plaint iff has now identified as Patrick Drummond, from this action without prejudice, because the claims against Mr. Drummond are unrelated to the claims against the other defendants; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 02/24/2017. (rhm)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?