Reddix v. Arkansas Department of Workforce Services
Plaintiff: Lee Reddix
Defendant: Arkansas Department of Workforce Services
Case Number: 2:2017cv00029
Filed: February 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Helena Office
County: Phillips
Presiding Judge: Kristine G. Baker
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 20 Opinion and Order, the Court grants 10 Arkansas Department of Workforce Services' motion for summary judgment against Plaintiff Lee Reddix. Mr. Reddix's claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/31/2019. (cmn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reddix v. Arkansas Department of Workforce Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lee Reddix
Represented By: Jessica S. Yarbrough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arkansas Department of Workforce Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?