Prevost v. Westbrook et al
| John E Prevost, II |
| Valorie Westbrook, Moses Jackson, III, Gaylon Lay and Jeremy Andrews |
| 2:2017cv00144 |
| August 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Lee |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 33 Order entered on this day, this case is hereby dismissed. The relief requested is denied. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment entered this day would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/30/2019. (jbh)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER adopting 20 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as its findings in all respects, except to the extent it recommends the dismissal of separate defendants Valorie Westbrook and Jeremy Andrews, as those two defendants have subsequently been di smissed as defendants from this lawsuit based on 25 motion filed by plaintiff John E. Prevost, II; granting 16 defendants' motion for partial summary judgment consistent with the terms of this Order; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/4/2018. (cmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
