Saleh v. Beasley
Plaintiff: Anes Saleh
Defendant: Gene Beasley
Case Number: 2:2017cv00185
Filed: October 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Helena Office
County: St. Francis
Presiding Judge: Beth Deere
Presiding Judge: D. P. Marshall
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER overruling 12 belated objections. The Court stands by its 3/27/2018 10 Order and 11 Judgment. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/4/2018. (jak)
March 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 JUDGMENT: Saleh's petition is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/27/2018. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saleh v. Beasley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anes Saleh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gene Beasley
Represented By: Stacey Elise McCord
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?