Dunahue v. Kelly et al
| Reginald L Dunahue |
| David Knott, III, Jamin M Crawford, S Lane and James Dycus |
| 2:2018cv00021 |
| February 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Lee |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| James M. Moody |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
ORDER adopting 127 proposed findings and recommendations; granting 116 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint, with prejudice; and denying 129 Plaintiff's sixth motion to appoint counsel. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/18/2019. (kdr)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER adopting 100 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; and denying 88 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/14/2018. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER Adopting 53 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 46 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief is denied. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 7/20/2018. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Defendants Kelly, Reed, and Andrews are dismissed from this action, without prejudice. All claims other than the failure to protect claims against Defendants Knott and Crawford are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/1/2018. (mcz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
