Nelson v. United States of America et al
| Randy Scott Nelson |
| Sheila A Woodard, Martin D Tindel, Michele Wingo, Carlos Rivera and Gertrue |
| 2:2018cv00080 |
| June 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Out of State |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| James M. Moody |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 84 Order entered in this matter on this date, this case is dismissed. The relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/22/2019. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER adopting 73 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; granting 28 and 60 Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Wingo and Woodard; dismissing these two Defendants without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and denying 44 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/7/2019. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Adopting 7 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety. Defendant United States of America is dismissed with prejudice, for failure to state a claim and as immune from liability. Defendants Montalvo and Donato are dismissed without prejudice, for improper venue. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 7/9/2018. (mcz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
