Kelly v. Andrews et al
Jeffery Andrew Kelly |
James Dycus, Jeremy Andrews and David Knott |
2:2019cv00002 |
January 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
J Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 12 RESPONSE to #7 Answer to Complaint by Jeffery Andrew Kelly. (ljb) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Jeremy Andrews served on 1/28/2019. (fjg) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed. James Dycus served on 1/28/2019. (fjg) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed. David Knott served on 1/28/2019. (fjg) |
Filing 8 NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court. (tjb) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Jeremy Andrews, James Dycus, David Knott.(Edwards, Brittany) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Brittany Nicole Edwards on behalf of Jeremy Andrews, James Dycus, David Knott (Edwards, Brittany) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Amend #2 Complaint by Jeffery Andrew Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint) (ljb) |
![]() |
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Forwarded to USMS for service. (kdr) |
![]() |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Jeffery Andrew Kelly.(kdr) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeffery Andrew Kelly. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.