Parks v. Thorn et al
Plaintiff: Cable Thomas Parks
Defendant: Micheal Neal, Kristie Flud, Darrell Elkins, Rick Hickman, Ricky Thorn, Erica Mason and David Carruth
Case Number: 2:2019cv00008
Filed: January 24, 2019
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: James M Moody
Referring Judge: Joe J Volpe
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety #5 Partial Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff may proceed with his excessive force, sexual harassment, conditions of confinement, and inadequate medical care claims against Defendants Thorn and Elkins in their individual capacities only. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/22/2019. (ljb)
March 20, 2019 Filing 7 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Cable Thomas Parks re #5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations, #6 Order. (fjg)
March 6, 2019 Summons Issued as to Darrell Elkins, Ricky Thorn and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (ljb)
March 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons and the USM serve Defendants Thorn and Elkins at the addresses provided by Plaintiff without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 3/5/2019. (lej)
March 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed with his excessive force, sexual harassment, conditions of confinement, and inadequate medical care claims against Defendants Thorn and Elkins in their individual capacities only. All other claims be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any order adopting this partial recommendation would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 3/5/2019. (lej)
January 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit #1 . Service is not appropriate at this time. If Plaintiff wishes to amend his complaint and Addendum, he may complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this order, mark it as "Amended Complaint," and file within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's complaint, as it now stands, is partially deficient and some of his claims may be dismissed after 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/28/2019. (lej)
January 24, 2019 Filing 3 ADDENDUM to #2 Complaint against All Defendants, filed by Cable Thomas Parks.(kdr)
January 24, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Cable Thomas Parks. (ljb)
January 24, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cable Thomas Parks. (ljb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parks v. Thorn et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Micheal Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kristie Flud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darrell Elkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rick Hickman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ricky Thorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erica Mason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Carruth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cable Thomas Parks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?