Pinder v. Reichql et al
| Steven Pinder |
| Robert Floss, Tashor Kelley, William Straughn, Diamond Pharmacy Services, Jorge Dominicis, Gary Kerstien, Patrick Drummond, Greg Reichql, Stacy Roebuck, Steve MacDonald, T Bennett, Correct Care Solutions LLC, Rory Griffin, James Kelley, Wendy Kelley, Shelley Byers and Brenda Perry |
| 2:2020cv00047 |
| March 6, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 OBJECTION to #18 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Steven Pinder. (llg) |
Filing 21
ORDER granting #14 Request to withdraw #4 Motion. The #11 partial recommendation is declined without prejudice as moot. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/13/2020. (jak)
|
|
Filing 20
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for copies #19 . A copy was mailed to Plaintiff. The mail is slow at present. Plaintiff must be patient. If he does not receive a copy by 5/1/2020, he may renew his motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/10/2020. (lej)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION for Copies by Steven Pinder. (ljb) |
|
Filing 18
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed with his claims that Defendants Bennett, Reichql, James Kelley, and Griffin failed to provide him with proper medical care for glaucoma in violation of 1983 and the Arkansas Medical Malpractice Act. All other claims and Defendants be dismissed without prejudice. The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/7/2020. (lej)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare summons for Defendants T. Bennett, Reichql, James Kelley, and Rory Griffin; and directing the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of the summons, #12 Amended Complaint, and this Order on Defendants without prepayment of fees or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/7/2020. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #1 IFP application; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this order to the EARU Warden, the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, and the ADC Compliance Office. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/7/2020. (jbh)
|
| Summons Issued as to T Bennett, Rory Griffin, James Kelley, Greg Reichql and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (jbh) |
|
Filing 15
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting Plaintiff's motion for order #13 . The Court will do its best to accommodate Plaintiff's visual impairment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/2/2020. (lej)
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to #11 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed by Steven Pinder. (llg) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Order by Steven Pinder. (llg) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Steven Pinder.(kdr) |
| Filing 11 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction be denied #4 . Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 3/23/2020. (lej) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER noting #9 objections; directing the Clerk to reinstate #4 Pinder's motion; and requesting a recommendation from the Magistrate Judge in due course. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/20/2020. (ljb)
|
| Filing 9 OBJECTION to 7 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Steven Pinder. (llg) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER that Plaintiff's IFP Application is held in abeyance #1 . If Plaintiff wishes to amend his complaint, he may complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this order, mark it as "Amended Complaint," and file it within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 3/10/2020. (lej)
|
|
Filing 7
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction #4 . Plaintiff filed a motion styled as a preliminary injunction whereby he seeks the court to order Defendants to provide private specialty medical care. I find the motion is really a motion seeking affirmative relief rather than injunctive relief. Plaintiff seeks to impermissibly short circuit the judicial process by seeking immediate relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 3/9/2020. (lej)
|
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of Imminent Danger re #4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Steven Pinder. (ljb) |
| Filing 5 BRIEF IN SUPPORT of #4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Steven Pinder. (ljb) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Steven Pinder. (ljb) |
| Filing 3 BRIEF IN SUPPORT of #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Steven Pinder. (ljb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Steven Pinder. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Steven Pinder. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
