Thomas v. Hendrix
| Orlando Martrel Thomas |
| USA and Dwayne Hendrix |
| 2:2020cv00060 |
| March 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| James M Moody |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Dwayne Hendrix (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Dempsey, Jamie) |
Filing 5
ORDER directing the Clerk to serve a copy of #2 petition and this order on the respondent and the U.S. Attorney by regular mail. The respondent is directed to file an answer, motion or other response within 21 days after service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 4/27/2020. (ljb)
|
| Filing 4 RECEIPT FILED: $5.00, Receipt Number LIT076932 (jap) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; and directing Thomas, by 05/04/2020, to pay the five dollar filing fee. Unless and until the filing fee is paid, service of process will not be ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 04/02/2020. (ajt)
|
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Orlando Martrel Thomas. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Orlando Martrel Thomas. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
