Taylor v. Hendrix
| David W Taylor |
| Dewayne Hendrix |
| 2:2020cv00071 |
| April 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER of USCA as to #10 Notice of Appeal filed by David W Taylor: The Clerk of the district court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER. (ajt)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER of USCA as to #10 Notice of Appeal filed by David W Taylor: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to pay the fee in the district court or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of this order. (ajt)
|
| Filing 12 USCA Docketing Letter as to #10 Notice of Appeal filed by David W Taylor. USCA Case Number 20-2036. (ajt) |
| Filing 11 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to #10 Notice of Appeal re #7 Order and #8 Judgment. (ajt) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Order and #8 Judgment by David W Taylor. (ajt) |
| Filing 9 OBJECTIONS to #6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by David W Taylor. (llg) |
|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the #7 order entered today, this case is dismissed. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/13/2020. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER adopting #6 recommended disposition; dismissing without prejudice #2 petition as to grounds 1 and 2 and with prejudice as to grounds 3 and 4; and denying #3 #4 pending motions. A certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/13/2020. (kdr)
|
| Filing 6 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed and the requested relief be denied #2 . The pending motions be denied consistent with the recommendations herein #3 #4 . Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/6/2020. (lej) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #1 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/6/2020. (lej)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by David W Taylor. (ljb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by David W Taylor. (ljb) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by David W Taylor. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David W Taylor. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. Hendrix | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David W Taylor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dewayne Hendrix | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
