Jones v. Traylor et al
| Edward Jones |
| Wayne Traylor, Jesse B Daggett, William Aaron Traylor, Clarence Jones and Michael Traylor |
| 2:2020cv00116 |
| May 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER of USCA as to #4 Notice of Appeal filed by Edward Jones: The Clerk of the district court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER. (ajt)
|
| Filing 6 USCA Docketing Letter as to #4 Notice of Appeal filed by Edward Jones. USCA Case Number 20-2169. (ajt) |
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to #4 Notice of Appeal re #3 Order. (ajt) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Order by Edward Jones. (ajt) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's motion to proceed; dismissing without prejudice #2 Plaintiff's complaint as it fails to state a claim for relief; and directing the Clerk to close the case. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/4/2020. (ljb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Edward Jones.(ajt) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edward Jones. (ajt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
