Davis v. Musselwhite
| James R Davis |
| Marledge, Fletcher Long, Gary Musselwhite and Christophe |
| 2:2020cv00117 |
| May 28, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| D P Marshall |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/21/2020. (jak) |
Filing 12
ORDER denying #11 Motion to file a Corrected Petition and Motion to Appoint Counsel; and advising Davis he must sign, date, and return the "Notice, Consent and Reference of a Civil Action" form that as mailed to him on 06/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 07/09/2020. (ajt)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel and for Service by James R Davis. (ljb) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to #8 Consent Notice and Request for Production of Documents by James R Davis. (kdr) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #6 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Gary Musselwhite. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - 62CR-17-240 Sentencing Order, #3 Exhibit B - 62CR-17-241 Sentencing Order, #4 Exhibit C - 62CR-17-245 Sentencing Order, #5 Exhibit D - 62CR-17-298 Sentencing Order)(Yarbrough, Michael) (Docket text modified on 6/30/2020 to correct the linkage)(jak) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #9 Response to Amended Habeas Petition. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the linkage to include #6 Amended Petition and #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jak) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court to the parties. (lmc) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Lloyd Yarbrough, Jr on behalf of Gary Musselwhite (Yarbrough, Michael) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by James R Davis. Related document: #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James R Davis.(kdr) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing of Calculation Sheet by James R Davis. (kdr) |
Filing 4
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to amend the docket to substitute Gary Musselwhite, Warden, Grimes Unit ADC, in place of "Marledge" and "Fletcher Long" as Respondent; and directing the Clerk of the Court to serve a copy of #2 2254 Petition and this Order on Respondent Musselwhite. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 06/04/2020. (ajt)
|
Filing 3
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner may proceed without prepayment of fees and cost or security therefor. The Clerk will serve a copy of the Petition and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General by regular mail. The Respondent will file an Answer, motion, or other response to the Petition, in conformity with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases in the United States District Courts within twenty-one (21) days after service of this Petition, exclusive of the day of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 6/2/2020. (rph)
|
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James R Davis. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James R Davis. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.